Tuesday, July 26, 2005

"Baghdad Bob" Lives; Fictional News for a Fictional War

"People everywhere confuse what they read in newspapers for news." -A.J. Liebling

In early July, a horrific car bombing by Iraqi insurgents in Baghdad killed dozens of people, including several children. A U.S. military press release after the explosion quoted an "unidentified Iraqi" at the scene of the attack, who was fuming. The "unidentified Iraqi" was so mad that he had this to say:

"The terrorists are attacking the infrastructure, the children, and all of Iraq. They are enemies of humanity without religion or any sort of ethics. They have attacked my community today and I will now take the fight to the terrorists."

Amazingly enough, after an insurgent attack two weeks later on newly-trained Iraqi Security Forces (ISF), another "unidentified Iraqi" interviewed at the scene railed against those responsible. The angry man, quoted in another U.S military press release, said this:

"The terrorists are attacking the infrastructure, the ISF, and all of Iraq. They are enemies of humanity without religion or any sort of ethics. They have attacked my community today and I will now take the fight to the terrorists."

Well, that unidentified Iraqi seems to have quite a habit of finding himself conveniently armed with a stack of unchanging Republican talking points and getting himself quoted amidst the carnage of daily insurgent attacks.

Yesterday, however, after someone noticed the similarity between the ridiculous, over-the-top quotes by our Mesopotamian mystery man, the U.S. military apologized for the lines in its official news releases. Freaked out by the discovery of the outright falsifications and lies that led to the double quoting of a fictional person, and determined not to let it cause further exploration of their daily campaigns of disgusting war propaganda, two different military sources quickly put to the rest the "confusion" that they ascribed to an "administrative error."

While reading about this, I suddenly found myself drifting back to good ol' 2003, the year when the multilateralist-friendly Bush administration declared it was going to war simply to enforce U.N. resolutions about WMD. Although the rhetoric and talking points justifying the war have shifted a good five or six times since then, the same standards for fictional news stories were around.

Remember the outrage back in 2003 when the New York Times' Jayson Blair was caught making things up to fill his articles? Remember how it led to a national investigation of journalistic truth and ethics that exposed several other writers for having made up stories? Remember the soul-searching at the Times it caused? Remember the weeks of heavy media coverage it provoked?

Remember the hilarity back in 2003 when Iraqi Information Minister Muhammed Saeed al-Sahaf made up stories about how the war was going? (Sahaf was dubbed "Baghdad Bob" by dumb Americans who couldn't pronounce a name they hadn't seen on soap operas or in NASCAR races). Remember how we all laughed when he declared that "there are no American infidels in Baghdad" even as the city fell to U.S. troops? Remember the endless jokes on cable news networks and late-night shows about the silly Iraqis who pretended to be winning a war that they were clearly losing?

Well, it's a good thing that it's 2005 now and no one makes up silly stories anymore, especially not about things like losing a war in Iraq. Or maybe that's just what I've been led to believe because of the lack of media coverage given to this blatant example of U.S. propaganda.

The U.S. military and government can, and will, keep lying about the status of the war in Iraq to the bitter end. Let's not forget that the government tried to declare victory even as it was pulling out of Vietnam.

The truth deficit between the Bush administration and average Americans will continue to widen as the government gets more desperate in the face of an insurgency that continues to grow. No amount of lies, however, can cover the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians and 1,700 U.S. troops. In the end, the truth about a war that has recruited al-Qaida's next generation of suicide bombers will emerge, but the human lives lost and human rights abuses committed will remain as George W. Bush's legacy.

5 Comments:

Anonymous karena said...

Hey, Joe,
I have been wondering when you would post again. This looks like a good read and I will comment later. I am writing in regards to the long time it takes my blog to load. I will check my provider and find out why. I do have a lot of graphics, so maybe I need to update my service. Sometimes I am published and generate a lot of hits and the low bandwidth may be causing this. Thanks for writing and welcome back. I miss reading your insights.

8:47 PM  
Blogger Boinkette said...

You'd think the propaganda writers would at least be clever enough not to plagiarize themselves...but it seems they're no smarter than Ann Coulter.

Didn't the government almost start a special propaganda unit specifically for spreading fake news, then decide not to do it after public outcry? And then there were those videos with fake reporters saying great the Medicare plan was...and Armstrong Williams getting paid off to promote NCLB...

Of course, the conservatives get all up in arms over cases like Jayson Blair and Newsweek--in both of which cases the main ideas reported were true even when the details were not--but they somehow fail to notice that Bush administration is quite veracity-challenged itself. Perhaps Bush et al should just give up on politics and go into fiction.

Unfortunately, whenever I think about lying politicians (which is pretty much redundant), I think of Pinocchio. And that just makes me think of the joke in which Cinderella gets kicked out of Disneyland, and, upon being asked why she was kicked out, confesses that she sat on Pinocchio's face and said "lie to me."

1:58 AM  
Blogger The Biased Reporter said...

Great post, Joe! I read the same thing in the New York Times. And I came to the same conclusion.

2:47 PM  
Blogger Michael J. West said...

Wow, quite fascinating. Can you give the sources for the two press releases, Joe?

10:38 AM  
Blogger Joe said...

Sorry, I don't have the firsthand military sources. Just the article I linked to, which I think the New York Times also briefly discussed.

8:09 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home